Node:Confusion of = and ==, Next:Confusing foo++ and ++foo, Previous:Run-time errors, Up:Run-time errors
=
and ==
Consider the following program:
#include <stdio.h> /* To shorten example, not using argp */ int main() { int my_int = 0; if (my_int = 1) { printf ("Hello!\n"); } return 0; }
What will this program do? If you guessed that it will print
Hello!
, you are correct. The assignment operator (=
)
was used by mistake instead of the equality operator (==
).
What is being tested in the above if
statement is not whether
my_int
has a value of 1 (which would be written if my_int
== 1
), but instead what the value is of the assignment statement
my_int = 1
. Since the value of an assignment statement is
always the result of the assignment, and my_int
is here being
assigned a value of 1, the result is 1, which C considers to be
equivalent to TRUE
. Thus, the program prints out its greeting.
Even the best C programmers make this mistake from time to time, and
tracking down an error like this can be maddening. Using the
-Wall
option of GCC can help at least a little by giving you
a warning like the following:
equals.c: In function `main': equals.c:7: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value